[Disclaimer: I am no music critic but I do claim to be a
communication scholar with understanding of nonverbal communication. For e.g.
research shows that if a woman has a nasal voice, she is perceived to be
neurotic and when a man has the same, he is assumed to be effeminate. When a
woman has deep, loud voice she is considered aggressive and when a man has it,
he is considered as a capable leader]
Some months back, a photographer
friend captioned one of his beautiful rose photos with these words-- This one
is for you, Shreya Ghoshal. More
recently, I read a friend’s remark which went somewhat like this: What kind of
bees produces such honey in her throat?
I get it. I get why guys like her voice—sweet
and smooth like a quietly flowing stream that will not threaten her banks, that
will not seize the swimmer in fierce currents and sweep him downstream, that will
not erupt and rise or bubble and break—just a gently, ever-flowing, stable,
consistent, predictable, sweet stream. I get it why guys love her voice—like an
angelic whisper that delicately twirls on your face and throat, caressing,
beckoning, and always welcoming. Unlike the reality of women in their lives—the
volcanic mood swings, the demanding scrutiny, an uncompromising possessiveness,
typhoon in short. I get it why in contrast, Shreya Ghoshal’s voice seems to
descend from the clouds, gently into the Gangotri glacier, melting even more
imperceptibly, into a quiet, sparkling, youthful stream of everlasting love.
I understand why a voice like hers is needed
to sing “Tujh Mein Rab Dikta Hain, Kya Karun” (What do I do—I see God in
you) or belt a tamil melody like “Mannipaaya, Mannipaaya” (Forgive
me...Forgive me). A voice that is loyal, that loves and accepts and hugs and cherishes and
adores you—yeah, yeah, you—one-pointedly you! I get it, Guys!! I know why you
love her voice!
Maybe because I am a woman, and straight at
that, or maybe because I am prejudiced or maybe I have spent way too much time
reading and teaching nonverbal communication…but sorry, Shreya Ghoshal—you
don’t do it for me!
And run to the earthly rumblings of M.S.
Subbalakshmi, to that day, when I stood at Magan Sangrahalaya in
Sewagram, viewing and learning from Kumarappa’s words in the heart of Gandhi’s
heart. How perfect it seemed that day—when a solar cooker lying innocently next
to a miticool refrigerator (http://www.mitticool.in/) next to another rural
innovation seemed to somehow rhyme with Subbulakshmi’s rendition of Vaishnavo Janatho.
Or run to the monsoon outburst of Shuba
Mudgal’s “Ab Ke Sawan" that day when I was yearning for different musical
interpretation of the monsoons. How her songs rasped and broke and showered and
celebrated human life in all its ambiguity and beauty.
Or run and slide to the sensual whispers of Bombay Jaishree’s “Vaseegara”…a voice that is sweet, that beckons and promises
the sky—but never assures loyalty. A carefree voice that celebrates her life on
earth, that plays and taunts, and yet so endlessly sweet!
Or run into the clarion call of Mercedes Sosa,
blowing from the stomachy depths of Mother Earth “Cambia, todo Cambia" (Change,
Everything Changes). A voice to which I must remain running—ever active, ever
moving, ever alive and present. A voice that seeks me to become her, that
nudges and pinches until the soul stirs.
Or run and fall into the rising tides of Etta
James “At Last” and settle in…at last…at last. A voice that
compassionately says, “oh yeah, yeah” so much so that I know of girl friends
who hope to play this music at their wedding!
Yeah maybe I am prejudiced and in full respect
to the variety of voices that paint our soundscapes, I have to say this—Sorry,
Shreya Ghoshal—you don’t do it for me!
love your description of her voice!!
ReplyDeleteoh yeah? hmmm..but then you are a guy and you too probably are her fan....but didn't I say, she does not do it for me? (bawl...)
DeleteO God! How brutally you have turned a tranquil world of melodies upside down, and with it, a universe of perceived male sensibilities! Now I realise why I prefer Sunidhi Chauhan, she of the rebellious hues, over her! (Wonder though, what you think of Lata Mangeshkar!)
ReplyDeleteTeli you what, Bhavana. Shreya is not even a patch on singers like Norah Jones. No, I'm not being hypocritical.
I love Sunidhi too!! Sorry, I did not mean to bash men for their choices as it was to urge women to not internalize that desire.
DeleteAs far as Lata is concerned, no comments please. I value my life too much:)
Yeah, Norah Jones is haunting and so utterly feminine...
Lolz!!! Sunidhi is tonnnes better than Shreya... and same from me - "As far as Lata is concerned, no comments please. I value my life too much :)"
DeleteGreat, JKHoNa--at least now I know a friend with whom I can run for my life:)
DeleteHmm...that was such a lovely way to say that women should be themselves -- earthy, brutal, rasping and yet melodious if one were to only hear it! You are more than an expert in non-verbal communication; you excel in verbal communication too.
ReplyDeleteIn an aside: Hasn't Shreya sung any song that is not syrupy? I can't make out the different voices these days. To me they all sound alike, screechy and artificially sweet :(
Thanks, Zephyr (blush...:) I bet Shreya has song that are not syrupy. But the question is not about the song or the melody as much as the voice that she is associated with--don't you think? The demand for sweet voices--what does that mean? why does it sound so pleasant?
DeleteAah well, Zephyr, I guess I am trying to bridge my research world with the real world in the more comfortable confines of a blog...sorry, Shreya Ghoshal!
Bhavana, I don't know anything about the intricacies of voice. But, she is way too sweet for me. I do find monotony in her voice at times. But again, I can't comment for the lack of knowledge on the subject. However, you do sound very convincing here.
ReplyDeleteI too lack musical knowledge, Saru. Maybe she has musical intricacies that I do not understand. I guess I am approaching the characteristics of her voice from a sociological point of view. Why are voices like hers loved and preferred in India? How do other voices ground me? But seriously, I do not wish to disrespect any artist. It is just that she does not do it for me:)
DeleteActually, what people like and why is beyond my understanding. I think the phrase 'mass appeal' will be an appropriate answer here. Many a times what we construe as 'class' or 'cult' is a genre yet to emerge and evolve. There are some intelligent people who appreciate it much before others. Till that time the mass appeal things sell...
DeleteYeah, Saru. Even Dissentingmind pressed this point--it is not that people like sweet voices but the mob mentality takes over and then no one wants to dissent.
DeleteAh! Well! Thank God I like songs and do not bother to know the singer:):) For me to like a song it should make me want to sing..and if my voice is sweet and syrupy and I like it, there are no male sensibilities to be castigated..only narcissism:) Else, you would have set me wondering about why I liked the singers that I liked:)
ReplyDeleteUh oh, Suresh--now let me know which songs do you like? And I will start psychoanalyzing it...:) Suresh, thanks for reading my tantrums:)
DeleteNeat.
ReplyDeleteAll is well until "I get why GUYS like her voice"..
How does this guy-thing come into the picture?
The kind of patriarchy that you are implying is unreal and... grossly overstretched.
Thank you Dissentingmind for dissenting!!! It gives me the adequate challenge to explore and reflect deep. Ok, here is my response.
DeleteFirst of all, patriarchy is not merely the rule of the fathers--historically it did emanate from that but no longer holds true. Patriarchy these days is more understood as the domination of one ideology over the other. In this case domination of "sweet voice" over other voices.
Two, the guy thingy. One can respond to that quantitatively or qualitatively. Quantitatively, historically, music industry has been promoted by men who have continued to dominated by men in business. Next, patronage comes from the audience not only through listening via illegal downloads but also actually buying of music cds and attending concerts. In a country like India, where wage gap between genders is at least 30% and the ability to decide on how the money earned can be spent even lesser, the buying decision on an item like music cd "tends" to be dominated by men.
Qualitatively, it is a long journey through music crazy kolkata through the streets of Pune to closed Indian communities in United States--listening and watching what dialogues get enacted--who responds how. This post in a sense is a historical response to the domination of a particular ideology.
Does that mean women do not like Shreya Ghoshal or "sweet" voices? No, many thousands do--in lesser nos, but they definitely do. But how and why they do is very complex. Unlike men, women are complicated creatures. And frankly I could not figure out how to present that complexity without sacrificing the flow of words and the intent of the message--to once and for all, break that domination. But that is a flaw in the post and I humbly accept it.
I have attempted in my own feeble way to reflect on this complexity of women in my posts "A Chennai Friday" and to a smaller extent in "Why I hesitate to call my country motherland." Feel free to read them and dissent again.
Perhaps, if instead as a reader, you could read it from the writer's point of view--the drama unfolds in a woman's heart--there in one direction is the pull to endorse a "Sweet" voice, the act of rebellion, and moving to the other side of the spectrum to balance and bring harmony--the post then becomes more an empowering act for the woman willing to understand and accept the spectrum of voices.
However, all said, I respect your dissent. Please feel free to dissent more. I do not wish to out-argue you; rather thank you for being honest and courageous enough to be openly honest.
See, one cannot merely say that women are more complex creatures. All humans are equally complex to understand... and society makes women more different from men than just reproductively.
DeleteOn a side note, I, and many other men am not always affected by the sweetness ( think it is the high pitch that qualifies her voice to be described as sweet). Male gender is a larger portion of the heavy- metal music fandom, and the voices are definitely not what you call sweet!
By the way, I also sing and enjoy carnatic classical. Put carnatic and Metal together and try to make some sense in one person listening.
Just saying. Everyone can be complicated.
Ideas got a little mixed and inter-domained, I think you will understand.
You should have made this a post:) Not too late, you still can.
DeleteSuresh..:):) I can never manage your prolific writing skills, buddy. I am slow in everything...
DeleteRohan, buddy I disagree with you and agree with you. You proved my point when you spoke about metallic music. How many women singers are popular in that arena? Why not?
DeleteBut yes, one cannot stereotype all men as liking sweet voice--that is gross overgeneralization. In hindsight, I wish I had added a word or too that would have allowed other kinds of men their space and freedom from being "accused in toto."
But at that same time, I do not agree that complexity in women's lives is the same as men's. Women's histories, society, influences, the way they communicate their preferences is utterly different and mainstream knowledge gathering methods do not allow us to easily mine this information. Hence it is more complex.
Finally, we can hold an approach that everything is complex--a deconstructionist view which says--what after all can constitute a category, what can be of essence. Or we can hold on to categories as a way to start a dialogue--to find a place around the table to start a dialogue.
I hold firmly to this view for I want women to start interrogating the diversity of voices and the choices they do have and how to buck the dominant system and be themselves.
Metal requires heavy voice and growling, which women cannot do genetically.
DeleteI do agree that society is what separates the genders more than they actually are.
Bhavana, I enjoy reading your posts for their content and different subjects you choose to write :)
ReplyDeleteRahul, thank you for reading the various posts. I am very grateful. What more joy for a writer than to have his/her works read!
DeleteUh... i don't. I find it repetitive and exactly the same(i mean the songs); in fact all of this so called music that our so called films have.
ReplyDeleteOh, the pissing off shit.
Yeah..true at times, I guess. But I love some of the south Indian melodies--in fact I am crazy about several of them. Even in Bollywood with the infusion of sufi music and other global fusions--it is interesting and rich--don't you think? Or do you think they have an undercurrent of repetition?
DeleteFrom a musician's perspective, I know that after sometime, the amount of tunes available run out. At that moment it is imperative to switch over temporarily. That has not happened.
DeleteNice and catchy post title!
ReplyDeleteThanks:) if not the post, at least title (wink)!!!
DeleteDomination of sweet voice over other can hold true if you are absolutely sure that ‘domination’ is the right word to use. When you make such strong arguments, you compulsively narrow your mind to think along a particular line. Is that a bad thing? Not unless it’s made just for heck of making it and there is absolutely no substantial research to support the claim.
ReplyDeleteI cannot afford to overlook the iron grips of patriarchy for obvious reasons…it exists. At the same time, I believe it would be wise to consider some other factors which may contribute to the popularity of Shreya Ghoshal among men(the way you put it) –
Science and Psychology – It has been observed historically that a soothing melody or a sweet symphony pacifies the mind. The brain reacts very positively to such elements. My limited knowledge in this field bars my urge to try and explain the exact cause of this. The transcendental music that Mozart could compose, the vibrant opera of Puccini, the lullaby that puts a baby to sleep…are all similar in the context that they bring some amount of harmony, order and synchronicity to the mind. Now, whether a certain Mozart composition caters to particular class of human beings or if a lullaby is suppressive in character….is not a proper standard to measure the entity (music) that it reflects. If one does that, it would be like placing an unprecedented amount of importance on the abstractions. If you look at the absolutes and simply consider the objects which make a person happy, you may be able to see a pattern that rises beyond race, colour or gender.
The mob sentiment – The crowd simply follows the trend. Sometimes, the only opinion that they are able to form, apart from the obvious ‘misti gola’… is ‘everybody likes it’. A ‘misti gola’ gets acknowledged only after due permissions have been received from the world at large. It is almost a sacrilege to have a dissenting opinion; you become ‘unpopular’ and ‘weird’ right away. Therefore, it may be a good thing to ask those who tell you how sugarcoated her voice is, the exact meaning of the words they uttered.
Had there been such a tendency to suppress women and like everything that discreetly worships male superiority, songs like ‘Latoo’ (Shreya Ghoshal, Ghajini) would not have sold, lyrics like ‘choti ungli pe nachayegi, she is a small town girl’ would have been banned and good creations of art like ‘Maa’ would never have existed.
It’s all business, if you ask me. The ‘music’ guys are clever, the audience – stupid. They exploit the spineless audience mercilessly. At a given point, the audience is ready to like anything between ‘Dhinka Chika’ to ‘Pungi’ (or whatever that song was) to even ‘Nadaan Parindey’. It is not about trying to dominate for even that would require one to think. The aam aadmi is happy to let an opinion poll decide their course of action…they take only those decisions which are convenient.
Finally, I have got nothing against your article or the message it seeks to deliver. I respect your opinion and congratulate you on being able to construct such a powerful essay on empowerment. It is subtle and yet very intent; stunning.
My views are not meant to be construed as some sort of rebuttal or counterattack. They are merely my opinions and I do not mean to either impose them on anybody or claim their superiority over anything. For all it’s worth, thank you for responding back. I shall be following your blog closely.
Good day!
Thank you for taking time to make an articulated response. You are right--we are not here to out argue each other but to listen to the diversity of views and accept and keep them on the table. I keep yours.
DeleteAnd let me state mine in short: I am a sociologist. I believe the word made the world. I believe there is nothing called "objectivity" and there scientific interpretation is not possible with influence of social conditioning and therefore all scientific research are already tainted by centuries of sociological conditioning.
That all though there are various voices producing songs that are sold, there is a trend setter amongst them and that as per total overall sales or money earned by women singers across decades belongs to women singers who have "sweet" voices.
I agree that market creators have their own techniques into audience conditioning and yes, audience ability to step outside mob mentality is also poor. I also agree that there are way more forces at play than the narrow approach that I have presented above.
But buddy, if I tried to present a full blown research report--how will I get people to read anything??? It is for this reason I ran from research into blogging!!!:)
Many years back, when the music competition Sa re ga ma was still anchored by Sonu Nigam and Shreya Ghoshal had not yet been discovered, there was an episode judged by Javed Akhtar. One of the contestants, a young girl, sang beautifully. I expected her to win, but was shocked to find that she had scored the least. Javed Akhtar reasoned that though she had sung flawlessly, her pitch was all wrong as she had rendered the song in a lower scale. My heart went out to the contestant who bravely struggled to hold back tears at the injustice. This just about sums up the attitude that musicians, particularly in the film industry, have towards anybody who does not have a high pitch.
ReplyDeleteMusic is an emotion. And in a country like ours, it is more pronounced and even exaggerated to a large extent. And how else to do it but through reinforcing popular images and roles through stereotyped voices. So we have sweet, virginal sounding voices like Shreya and Lata for heroines, while Sunidhi, Usha Uthup, and Rekha Bharadwaj sing the raunchy non-heroine numbers. Asha Bhonsale is extremely versatile and perhaps that is the reason she has sung playback for a variety of roles. The men don't escape stereotyping either, though not as much as the women.
In Tamil movies, all the heroines talk in sickeningly, cloying high-pitched sing-song voices. This, I feel, is a way to reinforce the helplessness of the woman.
I could go on about music and communication, Bhavan, but then it will become longer than your post and the wonderful debate generated here. Glad to be part of it. :-)
You might like to read this article by Aakar Patel on how emotions speak louder than words in India. He explains this by using music as a medium of communication
http://www.livemint.com/2010/02/05214319/In-India-emotions-speak-loude.html
Namaste, Sudhagee and welcome to my home! Your comment describes the intent of my post upfront and way more clearly. This comment itself could have been a post. Yes, I am in synch with you. I had avoided saying that sweet voices also tend to sound "virginal" but that is an important undercurrent. I find that the Virgin/Whore dichotomy spreads deep in the music world.
DeleteSudhagee, please do write a full post on this subject-- you have way more to say and at least, I would like to know and learn.
Will read Aakar Patel's article. Thanks for the link and thanks for participating in this enriching discussion.
Vaseegara is my favourite too, grew up listening to MS as well! Love Shubha Mudgal too and Yes, I agree with the post. Have you heard "Seekho Na Naino ki Bhasha Piya" by Shubha Mudgal. I have a feeling you would like it!
ReplyDeleteNo, Deepa, I have not heard the Mudgal music you mention. Will now have to hear it! Me too-grew up with MS! Looks like we have similar tastes:)
DeleteFor all those who are reading this post, this Livemint article by Aakar Patel is a great accompaniment.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.livemint.com/2010/02/05214319/In-India-emotions-speak-loude.html
Thanks to Sudhagee for pointing it out.
Shreya is good. I like her for the hardwork she puts in for each song. I like the way she tries to reach close to the actual pronunciation when she renders. apart from that, i've very few collections of her's that I really adore.
ReplyDeleteI believe her voice has become as a market friendly commodity that the music makers can easily and readily exploit.
Thank you, Leo for standing up for Shreya, the artist. My blog wanted to expose the inequalities in voice preferences in society but the artist's hardwork and personal efforts can never be belittled. Thank you for making it a point to state that.
DeleteBut to note, as you have aptly stated,for every Shreya that got created and loved, there are hundreds of singers in the field who have not come to the fore because they did not have the voice that was marketable. In that sense, this blog also honors those unknown artists.
This is the first time I am visiting your blog and I really like the bold, forthright way you express your thoughts...It is simply how you feel about something and I guess that by its very nature is beyond comment. However, as you have your choice of likes and dislikes, I think the same is true for everyone else where gender need not necessarily be the determinant factor :)
ReplyDeleteEnjoyed your post. Good luck!
Thanks Priya both for your observation as well as compliments. I guess I use the "personal" approach because I come from an "interpretivist" approach where knowledge is considered to be mediated by the subject with specific life experiences who is seeing and writing but works on bracketing those experiences out. Hence I do not believe in "The truth" but rather "truths." Similarly because I am influenced by critical thinking, I always seek to examine the power inequalities in various aspects of social life. So in that sense, my writing is never just a "layman" personal opinion, but is backed by deep thought, observation and documentation. But is presented in a lyrical blog style so I can reach out to larger audiences. But I am unceasingly a researcher always.
DeleteI agree about MS, and Shubha Mudgal.
ReplyDeleteIn our times, we used to cringe hearing P.Susheela singing, we would rather enjoy P.Leela or L.R. Easwari. Same goes for enjoying Ashaji too.for me she tops in Hindi film music of our times.
Yeah for Ashaji--I love her too--I am crazy about her!!! But then that is also a dominant ideology in a way right--we need a balance of things, don't you think?
Deleteshreya goshal has a terrific voice....
ReplyDelete:):) yes, of course she does...for you:)
DeleteGod, i hate you for being so bluntly true. When i give it a thought you are right, may be thats why we guys like her voice, b'coz of its angelic texture.
ReplyDeleteBut as an artist Shreya is simply outstanding. She can pick the exact emotion in lyrics just like Dr. K. J. Yesudas, without missing a grain. And the way she render it with all its musical intricacies, man i like her.
:):) What do I say, Mist that will not make you hate me more!!! Yes, Shreya, the artist is wonderful! But there are others too whose voice have never made it to the cds and film playlists because they were not "sweet" as expected although they could also pick every exact emotion!
Deletei don't know how you missed to notice the magic of her voice. Not just the voice her ability to pick up most minute emotions between lines. She reminds me of Dr. K. J. Yesudas. The way she render each song with full conviction, god its awesome. To me a singer is great not b'coz of the voice but the ability to give life to a song.
ReplyDelete:):) I just love the way you stand up for Shreya Ghoshal--I hope she knows how well you have appreciated her work!!!!
DeleteBut what to do, Mist, she does not do it for me! Her
"voice renders me restless, disturbed, and in a strange way oppressed. For every delicate turn of the note that your voice coos and welcomes in and reminds me what I am not, I take to my feet and run."
U have nicely described about her voice,,,really... But I am a girl still I love her voice... Everyone has different choices of music as well as singers too..We may not know which voice is going to blow your mind or give a smoothish touch..But in this case I don't think that all boys love her voice for those reasons..The people who know classical they will know how perfectly she sings every songs.It's totally my point of view..And yes there are so many female fans too of Shreya Ghoshal :)She is just amazing ...
ReplyDeletevoices like shreya, lata, and even mehdi hassan have a perfection that cuts it for most people. it depends on what one is looking for i guess. an MS or a gangubai hangal can capture emotions that are impossible to replicate. it is like ideal weather all year round. it would be nice, but then it would not serve the purpose. loved the way you have used the singers to showcase the range of human experiences, emotions, and needs. there are two aspects to being a musician apart from the technical finesse that are important to me. ow genuine it sounds and how you use it to contribute to the culture of your times. in times like ours, we need more shobha mudgals and usha uthups who will use their talents to bring change to the world.
ReplyDeleteit has been raining like crazy for the last 24 hours and we have ab ki sawan playing, so remembered this post.
shreya voice is nice but Checkout this Mesmerizing Voice of duo sisters Vidhya & Vandana "Classical Carnatic music" Nee nenaindal agadadu undo
ReplyDeleteNirajadala nayani mahalaksmi
நீ நினைந்தால் ஆகாததுà®®் உண்டோ
நிரஜடல நயனி மகாலக்ஸ்à®®ி & aasai mugam marandhu poachchae – idhai yaaridam solvaenadi thoazhi
ஆசைà®®ுகம் மறந்து போச்சே – இதை யாà®°ிடம் சொல்வேனடி தோà®´ி?
I have forgotten that lovely face, whom shall I share this grief with ?
What about Alka Yagnik, isn't she better than shreya ghoshal, sunidhi chauhan, and is on par with lata mangeshkar and asha bhosle ? Alka Yagnik is best, all the ingredients of a good voice, melody, velvety, sweet, soothing, emotion, stir up energy, vibrancy, princess.......why do u think she was over used in the industry and became shrill......but if a good album like umrao jaan comes up, she did justice ! Alka Yagniks voice suited Aishwarya Rai best ! So feminine, catchy, lovable ! Shreya Ghoshal is excellent, but she will never get the songs Alkaji got, she can never add that component that Alkaji adds to each song, that uniqueness, distinctive style, class, golden touch........alkaji doesn't sing today because of 'no moelody'........dont blame her.....shreya and sunidhi songs are famous today tomorrow gone ......short life span........we stil hum alkaji's music today !
ReplyDeleteHello Bhavana,
DeleteI am very much impressed by the words "Your voice renders me restless, disturbed, and in a strange way oppressed. For every delicate turn of the note that your voice coos and welcomes in and reminds me what I am not, I take to my feet and run." You have perfectly expressed what I had in my mind.
However,had you always disliked her voice? I was a huge fan of hers in early 2000s. I feel ,she artificially makes her voice sound sweet now(which in fact is screechy,as rightly said by Zephyr) which she did not , when she won her first national award.
Is it just my illusion? Or is it the film industry that has created a situation like this? Or is this the way of hiding the aging of any female voice?
Pleas let me know through your research.
She has chosen the right songs that suit her voice, that is why people like her! I always liked Bombay Jayashree more! Or someone like Whitney Houston even though there is none as her and there will be none ever! :)
ReplyDeleteI find sheryas voice to sweet sometimes.yes she is definately one of the great female singer of recent time.but i prefer sunidhi over shreya for some reasons.shreya sing every song in her sweetly eg she sing chikni chemali and radha or balma in same tone which i found irritating.
ReplyDeletesunidhi is on other hand has ultimate and very strong voice.Its very rarity to found such strong voice in female singers.she always sing every song in very different way.eg she can sing high energetic numbers such as aisa jadoo,sheila ki jawani with ace,soft romantic numbers such as bhaage re maan, iseq sufiyana,tu zarrori,dekho na and some very unique songs that no one can sing like sajan ki vari vari, neeyat(teen patti),kaise pehali zindagani.etc.
Am actually smiling to myself while typing this - why did we not talk about musical tastes between us before?
ReplyDeleteI love Asha Bhosle the best and was never fond of the nightingale Lata...ha ha...
And I loved Asha for the absolute freedom and gypsie like quality to it which can simulate such feelings inside me...I resonated with her voice!
I remember Mannipaya song by Shreya...yes...but I don't like it very much...
Subha Mudgal is my all time fav - ab ke savan is fabulous - every time I listen to it, I feel the rain splashing on me...such is the effect!